magpie.girl ๐ reposted
2026-02-12 21:18 ๐จ๐ฆ
maybe users could all make an agreement and then bring it to someone with the ability to remove posts/users? i don't like the idea of a moderator but having a way people could agree upon an action and only do it then once it's come to a consensus sounds nice, and the only way i can think of that is someone with moderator privileges who is only allowed to act in the interest of the users
kind of like... a judge...
with the users as like...... a jury of sorts.... huh...
fuck i reinvented the legal system
kind of like... a judge...
with the users as like...... a jury of sorts.... huh...
fuck i reinvented the legal system
magpie.girl ๐
2026-02-12 20:50 ๐จ๐ฆ
(2/2)
if we lean into the anarchy/community thing we've been doing, we could have users anonymously vote to remove someone or something, or collectively come to a decision non-anonymously which would probably have less risk of exploitation
of course people will try to game the system by botting (or having too much free time) so it'd have to be some way where there's less risk of that
to be fully honest, i don't want to be banned or muted lmao. i don't think i would be, but im acknowledging that i'm biased toward thinking of this community as "my kinds of people" when i know there are people who could join and just as unanimously dislike me and want me gone.
i don't know how to solve this issue. to me, having some sort of system where users could publicly agree to axe someone or something might be good, i think that could be influenced most by the core members of the community rather than random people
anyway this is my take, please share your thoughts if you have any
if we lean into the anarchy/community thing we've been doing, we could have users anonymously vote to remove someone or something, or collectively come to a decision non-anonymously which would probably have less risk of exploitation
of course people will try to game the system by botting (or having too much free time) so it'd have to be some way where there's less risk of that
to be fully honest, i don't want to be banned or muted lmao. i don't think i would be, but im acknowledging that i'm biased toward thinking of this community as "my kinds of people" when i know there are people who could join and just as unanimously dislike me and want me gone.
i don't know how to solve this issue. to me, having some sort of system where users could publicly agree to axe someone or something might be good, i think that could be influenced most by the core members of the community rather than random people
anyway this is my take, please share your thoughts if you have any
5