char.social ● 7 online ○ 77 lurking

⌂ #

← context

|\\\\ ////| 
| \\\V/// | 
|  |~~~|  | 
|  |===|  | 
|  |l  |  | 
|  | o |  | 
 \ |  c| /  
  \|===|/

dawood 🌟 2026-05-29 19:57 🇳🇱

The point is, accusing authorities of crimes is not a thing that should be taken lightly.

If you have proof that you personally think is very strong, you should risk the harm of presenting it. If you have proof that you personally think is bad, don’t.

⤷ 2

reply to this post

replies (2)

liked new old

mothgoth 🌟 2026-05-29 20:29 🇳🇱

Where's the line? Is public speculation of crime illegal? Is private speculation of crime illegal? Would it be illegal to research potential crime? Does freedom of speech still stand intact?

What if you have unfalsifiable proof, but a court denies it? What fucked then? Do you get thrown in jail regardless, on basis of "crimes against authorities"?

Authoritarian bootlicker mentality this shit. This is what abrahamic religions do to you.

⤷ 1

|\\\\ ////| 
| \\\V/// | 
|  |~~~|  | 
|  |===|  | 
|  |l  |  | 
|  | o |  | 
 \ |  c| /  
  \|===|/

dawood 🌟 2026-05-29 20:34 🇳🇱

I’m not really a member of any abrahamic religion, although I have respect for them.

As for where the line is, no one has provided a good answer to that question for thousands of years, I’m not about to do it now.

No matter how thorough you are, you will still end up hurting good people. Unfortunately, the correct answer is just to do your best with the knowledge you have. For some people that will be with little evidence, others will set the bar too high.

I think in an educated society, we’d sort of have a similar sense of where the line is, but the truth is, the bar is set by you. No one can help you with this. It you mustn’t take it lightly.

⤷ 0

reply to this post

replies (2)

welcome to char.social